<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solidworks 2009 vs. Inventor 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/solidworks-2009-vs-inventor-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/solidworks-2009-vs-inventor-2009/</link>
	<description>Personal comments to Autodesk Inventor, AutoCAD, DWF and programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 3dcad</title>
		<link>http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/solidworks-2009-vs-inventor-2009/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>3dcad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3dcad.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Hi madmaxman,
I have personally rather old experience with SolidWorks when we evaluated SolidWorks and Inventor (and chose Inventor for its features and compatibility). I have no details about the 64-bit version of SolidWorks but they are known to announce features &quot;too early&quot; - remember the loud &quot;first Vista CAD&quot; announcements of SolidWorks 2007 (which proved to be unusable in Vista).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi madmaxman,<br />
I have personally rather old experience with SolidWorks when we evaluated SolidWorks and Inventor (and chose Inventor for its features and compatibility). I have no details about the 64-bit version of SolidWorks but they are known to announce features &#8220;too early&#8221; &#8211; remember the loud &#8220;first Vista CAD&#8221; announcements of SolidWorks 2007 (which proved to be unusable in Vista).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madmaxman</title>
		<link>http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/solidworks-2009-vs-inventor-2009/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>madmaxman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3dcad.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Hmmm,

SolidWorks had 64 bit in 2007 &amp; 2008.  Not new to 2009.  SolidWorks has always had dual dimensions.  How long has your friend Sergio been on SolidWorks?  How long have you been on inventor?  Do a comparison side by side with all features offered.  Not just a few.  Sheet Metal, Molding, Weldments, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm,</p>
<p>SolidWorks had 64 bit in 2007 &amp; 2008.  Not new to 2009.  SolidWorks has always had dual dimensions.  How long has your friend Sergio been on SolidWorks?  How long have you been on inventor?  Do a comparison side by side with all features offered.  Not just a few.  Sheet Metal, Molding, Weldments, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soliddna</title>
		<link>http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/solidworks-2009-vs-inventor-2009/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>soliddna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3dcad.wordpress.com/?p=80#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Hi All

Functions mention in both can be found in Solid Edge also for years...

Take a look, they all not review but with time i might cover everything

www.soliddna.wordpress.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All</p>
<p>Functions mention in both can be found in Solid Edge also for years&#8230;</p>
<p>Take a look, they all not review but with time i might cover everything</p>
<p><a href="http://www.soliddna.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.soliddna.wordpress.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
