<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inventor is much faster than Solidworks, Pro/E, Catia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/inventor-is-much-faster-than-solidworks-proe-catia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/inventor-is-much-faster-than-solidworks-proe-catia/</link>
	<description>Personal comments to Autodesk Inventor, AutoCAD, DWF and programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:59:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Performancevergleich Inventor, Pro/E, Catia, UG-NX, SolidWorks &#124; Autodesk Inventor FAQ Blog</title>
		<link>http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/inventor-is-much-faster-than-solidworks-proe-catia/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Performancevergleich Inventor, Pro/E, Catia, UG-NX, SolidWorks &#124; Autodesk Inventor FAQ Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://3dcad.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/inventor-is-much-faster-than-solidworks-proe-catia/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] 3D CAD berichtet, gibt es einen &#8220;Vergleichstest&#8220;, in der verschiedene, alltägliche [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3D CAD berichtet, gibt es einen &#8220;Vergleichstest&#8220;, in der verschiedene, alltägliche [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
